StevenLuMT opened a new pull request #2957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2957


   Descriptions of the changes in this PR:
   
   
   
   ### Motivation
   
   bugfix:
   when enforceMinNumRacksPerWriteQuorum is false, no need to check racks in 
quorum
   when all bookies is in a rack,when the old bookie node is offline for 
machine is broken,the ReplicationWorker want call method 
BookKeeperAdmin.getReplacementBookiesByIndexes, but find 
minNumRacksPerWriteQuorum(default value is 2) is large than racksInQuorum,but 
enforceMinNumRacksPerWriteQuorum(default value is false) is not open for 
checking this rack.
   
   So I think we should charge enforceMinNumRacksPerWriteQuorum is closed,no 
need to check rack's information
    
   <img width="668" alt="image" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42990025/147206534-bf9f3568-4463-4727-89c4-85ef0f3e9924.png";>
   <img width="808" alt="image" 
src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/42990025/147207554-8290677f-23e1-4077-84f3-ba7b352a8a30.png";>
   
   
   ### Changes
   
   bugfix: when enforceMinNumRacksPerWriteQuorum is false, no need to check 
racks in quorum


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to