lordcheng10 commented on a change in pull request #3061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/3061#discussion_r810508304



##########
File path: 
bookkeeper-server/src/main/java/org/apache/bookkeeper/util/collections/ConcurrentLongLongPairHashMap.java
##########
@@ -220,22 +329,36 @@ public void forEach(BiConsumerLongPair processor) {
     }
 
     // A section is a portion of the hash map that is covered by a single
+    @Setter
     @SuppressWarnings("serial")
     private static final class Section extends StampedLock {
         // Keys and values are stored interleaved in the table array
         private volatile long[] table;
 
         private volatile int capacity;
         private volatile int size;
-        private int usedBuckets;
-        private int resizeThreshold;
-
-        Section(int capacity) {
+        private volatile int usedBuckets;
+        private int resizeThresholdUp;
+        private int resizeThresholdBelow;
+        private volatile float mapFillFactor;

Review comment:
       @eolivelli  
   The purpose of this PR is to solve the problem of pendingAcks taking up too 
much memory in pulsar.
   I would like to support dynamic configuration of these parameters in pulsar 
for the following reasons:
   1. If the current memory resources are relatively tight, we need to increase 
the mapIdleFactor to reduce the wasted memory space, but at this time, the 
number of rehashes will increase, and the time-consuming of put and remove will 
increase.
   2. If we want put/remove to take less time, we need to reduce mapIdleFactor, 
reduce the number of rehash, and exchange space for time;




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@bookkeeper.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to