[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15015356#comment-15015356
 ] 

Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-849:
-------------------------------------------

I'm not up to speed with this issue, however it looks like did you consider 
https://github.com/biboudis/streamalg?
It looks like streamalg supports both push and pull at the same time.

> Streams/Slow iterators dont close on statement close
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-849
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-849
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jesse Yates
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>             Fix For: 1.5.0
>
>         Attachments: calcite-849-bug.patch
>
>
> This is easily seen when querying an infinite stream with a clause that 
> cannot be matched
> {code}
> select stream PRODUCT from orders where PRODUCT LIKE 'noMatch';
> select stream * from orders where PRODUCT LIKE 'noMatch';
> {code}
> The issue arises when accessing the results in a multi-threaded context. Yes, 
> its not a good idea (and things will break, like here). However, this case 
> feels like it ought to be an exception.
> Suppose you are accessing a stream and have a query that doesn't match 
> anything on the stream for a long time. Because of the way a ResultSet is 
> built, the call to executeQuery() will hang until the first matching result 
> is received. In that case, you might want to cancel the query because its 
> taking so long. You also want the thing that's accessing the stream (the 
> StreamTable implementation) to cancel the querying/collection - via a call to 
> close on the passed iterator/enumerable.
> Since the first result was never generated, the ResultSet was never returned 
> to the caller. You can get around this by using a second thread and keeping a 
> handle to the creating statement. When you go to close that statement though, 
> you end up not closing the cursor (and the underlying iterables/enumberables) 
> because it never finished getting created.
> It gets even more problematic if you are use select * as the iterable doesn't 
> finish getting created in the AvaticaResultSet.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to