[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15035786#comment-15035786
 ] 

Maryann Xue commented on CALCITE-992:
-------------------------------------

BTW, the existing test cases in sequence.oq pass with this patch, and I'll add 
counter cases later. Having a new RexNode type would require same amount of 
changes but would look nicer, IMO.

> Validate and resolve sequence reference as a Table object
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-992
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-992
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Maryann Xue
>            Assignee: Maryann Xue
>             Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>         Attachments: CALCITE-992.suggested.diff
>
>
> Currently the validator does not validate if the sequence exists or if the 
> corresponding table is of the required type, etc. Also, in NEXT_VALUE and 
> CURRENT_VALUE function, we need the sequence Table object instead of the 
> sequence name string.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to