[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1051?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Frankie Bollaert updated CALCITE-1051:
--------------------------------------
    Summary: Underflow exception occurs when executing query which has an 
in-clause with more than 19 ids  (was: Underflow exception occurs when 
executing query which has an in-clause with more than 19 ids.)

> Underflow exception occurs when executing query which has an in-clause with 
> more than 19 ids
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1051
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1051
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Frankie Bollaert
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Underflow exception occurs when executing query with more then 19 values in 
> the in-clause.
> Example below illustrates the problem in the csv example:
> {code}
> select e.name from emps as e where e.empno in (130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 
> 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130 );
> Error: Error while executing SQL "select e.name from emps as e where e.empno 
> in (130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 
> 130, 130, 130, 130, 130, 130 )": Underflow (state=,code=0)
> {code}
> The SqlToRelConverter will convert this to a SemiJoin.  Literals in the IN 
> clause value list are scaled.  When the type of the literal does not have a 
> scale set, as happens with a java.lang.Integer, the default value of the 
> type.scale is chosen, which is Integer.MIN_VALUE.  Scaling to this value 
> causes the underflow.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to