[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15105581#comment-15105581
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-669:
------------------------------------
Anyone have opinions on how to map the 3 levels from java logging to the 2
which slf4j provide?
Java Logging
* FINE
* FINER
* FINEST
Slf4j Levels
* DEBUG
* TRACE
What kind of breakdown would we want here? DEBUG == (FINE and FINER), TRACE ==
FINEST? DEBUG == FINE, TRACE == (FINER and FINEST)?
> Move from Commons Logging to SLF4J
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-669
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Nick Dimiduk
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> As mentioned on CALCITE-641, it could be useful to adopt a logging
> implementation that supports pluggable backends and has
> [MDC|http://www.slf4j.org/manual.html#mdc] support.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
