[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15155642#comment-15155642
]
chenzhifa commented on CALCITE-1097:
------------------------------------
I have a fix in here: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/198
I have added a new test to cover it and all tests have passed.
> exception met when executing query with too many aggregation columns
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1097
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1097
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.7.0
> Reporter: chenzhifa
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> When executing a query like the following:
> select s."cust_id", sum(s."prod_id"), sum(s."prod_id_1"), ......,
> sum(s."prod_id_194"), sum(s."prod_id_195"), sum(s."prod_id_196"),
> sum(s."prod_id_197"), sum(s."prod_id_198"), sum(s."prod_id_199")
> from "foodmart"."table" as s group by s."cust_id"
> Calcite reports exception as followed:
> Exception in thread "main" java.sql.SQLException: Error while executing SQL
> Error while compiling generated Java code:
> public static class Record200_0 implements java.io.Serializable {
> .....
> Caused by: org.codehaus.janino.JaninoRuntimeException: Baz$2.apply(): Operand
> stack overflow at offset 1195
> at org.codehaus.janino.CodeContext.flowAnalysis(CodeContext.java:490)
> Tracking down the error in EnumerableAggregate, I found that this is because
> Calcite generates a class with a constructor which has as many parameters as
> the aggregated fields, and the auto-generated java code causes error while
> being compiled.
> There is not a certain number of constructor number, since it seems the
> longest length of constructor parameter also relates to the java type of the
> parameters.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
