[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15325331#comment-15325331
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-1287:
-------------------------------------
Added the TCK test in
https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=calcite.git;a=commit;h=113a034ec1689dd8313af5d2f2d2431f1e666eaa
Will wait to hear back from Kevin before closing this as cannot-repro. He might
have some critical details.
> Potential wire compatibility issue with binary data
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1287
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Test
> Components: avatica
> Affects Versions: avatica-1.8.0
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Fix For: avatica-1.9.0
>
>
> Was chatting with [~kliew] today who mentioned that he thought there might be
> an issue with the wire-protocol with binary data ({{TypedValue.BYTE_STRING}}).
> avatica-1.8.0 did contain a change to how binary data was sent using
> protobufs (reported by [~francischuang] in CALCITE-1209, ultimately fixed in
> CALCITE-1103), but I believe this was done in a backwards compatible way.
> I just added a test to the TCK which shows that it is compatible with 1.6.0
> and 1.7.1, but maybe there is an edge condition I'm over looking (or the Java
> driver is masking).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
