[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Julian Hyde updated CALCITE-1306:
---------------------------------
    Description: 
Allow GROUP BY and HAVING to reference SELECT expressions by ordinal and alias. 
It is not standard SQL, but MySQL and PostgreSQL allow it.

See [Stack Overflow: SQL - using alias in Group 
By|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3841295/sql-using-alias-in-group-by].

It would be enabled only by new methods {{isGroupByOrdinal}} and 
{{isGroupByAlias}} in SqlConformance.

We might allow alias in the HAVING clause (as described in HIVE-10557) but 
ordinal does not make sense.

  was:
Allow GROUP BY and HAVING to reference SELECT expressions by ordinal and alias. 
It is not standard SQL, but MySQL and PostgreSQL allow it.

See 
[http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3841295/sql-using-alias-in-group-by|Stack 
Overflow: SQL - using alias in Group By] .

It would be enabled only by new methods {{isGroupByOrdinal}} and 
{{isGroupByAlias}} in SqlConformance.

We might allow alias in the HAVING clause (as described in HIVE-10557) but 
ordinal does not make sense.


> Allow GROUP BY and HAVING to reference SELECT expressions by ordinal and alias
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1306
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1306
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Julian Hyde
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> Allow GROUP BY and HAVING to reference SELECT expressions by ordinal and 
> alias. It is not standard SQL, but MySQL and PostgreSQL allow it.
> See [Stack Overflow: SQL - using alias in Group 
> By|http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3841295/sql-using-alias-in-group-by].
> It would be enabled only by new methods {{isGroupByOrdinal}} and 
> {{isGroupByAlias}} in SqlConformance.
> We might allow alias in the HAVING clause (as described in HIVE-10557) but 
> ordinal does not make sense.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to