[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15406143#comment-15406143
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-1335:
-------------------------------------
In case you weren't aware, the support for Arrays in the Avatica wire protocol
are also lacking. It's on my list to get around to CALCITE-1050
> ArrayImpl to return JDBC objects for method getArray()
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1335
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: avatica
> Affects Versions: avatica-1.8.0
> Reporter: Maryann Xue
>
> Avatica uses Integer or Long representations for Date/Time/Timestamp objects,
> and similarly for Date/Time/Timestamp array objects. However, when calling
> getArray() method, the array implementation (class ArrayImpl) should decode
> from its internal representation and convert it into JDBC types before
> returning the objects to the client.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
