[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jesus Camacho Rodriguez updated CALCITE-1351: --------------------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 1.9.0 > "IS [NOT] NULL" operator should have higher precedence than "NOT" operator > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CALCITE-1351 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1351 > Project: Calcite > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.8.0 > Reporter: hongbin ma > Assignee: Julian Hyde > Fix For: 1.9.0 > > > hi calcite experts > when I run an auto-generated query(by BI tools): > {code:sql} > select "TEST_KYLIN_FACT"."LSTG_FORMAT_NAME", sum("TEST_KYLIN_FACT"."PRICE") > from "DEFAULT"."TEST_KYLIN_FACT" "TEST_KYLIN_FACT" group by > "TEST_KYLIN_FACT"."LSTG_FORMAT_NAME" having NOT > sum("TEST_KYLIN_FACT"."PRICE") is null > {code} > the query failed due to : " Cannot apply 'NOT' to arguments of type > 'NOT<DECIMAL(19, 4)>'. Supported form(s): 'NOT<BOOLEAN>'" > however the same query would succeed in mysql. I guess calcite is giving > "NOT" operation higher precedence than "IS NULL" operator. > Then I googled and found this page: > https://docs.oracle.com/cd/A57673_01/DOC/server/doc/SQL73/ch3a.htm, it's > oracle's standard, I'm quoting for as a reference. In this page, it says "All > comparison operators" has a higher precedence than "NOT","AND","OR", and "IS > [NOT] NULL" is one of the comparison operators. > With all the clues above I'm believing it's a calcite's bug. Please correct > me if I'm wrong. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)