[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1701?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15926557#comment-15926557
]
Josh Elser commented on CALCITE-1701:
-------------------------------------
bq. As far as I can tell, this would be a plus for Drill which is still on
older version of protobuf and also uses jackson internally.
Not as big of an issue as it seems -- these dependencies are bundled and
relocated via the shade plugin. There isn't a problem with the traditional
issues that come with these two libraries. Just bloat in your application
downstream.
That said, we still want to address this. I just don't want this to be
interpreted as something it isn't :)
> Move Protobuf and Jackson transports out of Avatica core module
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1701
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1701
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: avatica
> Reporter: Julian Hyde
> Assignee: Josh Elser
>
> Move Protobuf and Jackson transports out of Avatica core.
> Among other things, this will allow projects to depend on Avatica without
> introducing dependency clashes on their own versions of Jackson and Protobuf.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
