[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15959938#comment-15959938
 ] 

Maryann Xue commented on CALCITE-1742:
--------------------------------------

Thank you, [~jni], for pressing me on the details! I first thought the tableMap 
was more like another layer of cache and then when I started to fix the issue I 
realized it was for another purpose. I had decided to update the description 
together with my PR, but it's definitely better that I do it now.

> CalciteCatalogReader should not add resolved tables into CalciteSchema's 
> explicit table map
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1742
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1742
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.12.0
>            Reporter: Maryann Xue
>            Assignee: Maryann Xue
>
> {{CalciteSchema}} is designed to have two sets of objects, the explicit and 
> the implicit. A explicit object means an object we add through explicit 
> {{CalciteSchema#addTable}} (or {{CalciteSchema.addFunction}}, etc) calls, 
> while an implicit object means an object we get from the underlying 
> {{Schema}} object's getXXX methods.
>  
> However, in {{CalciteCatalogReader#getTableFrom}}, after a table is resolved 
> through {{CalciteSchema.getTable}} method, it will be added to the 
> {{CalciteSchema}} again as an explicit object regardless of whether it is 
> originally implicit or explicit. So if it happens to be an implicit table, 
> any change about that table later on will be shadowed by the newly added 
> explicit object and thus cannot be accessed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to