[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16028280#comment-16028280
]
Julian Hyde edited comment on CALCITE-1584 at 5/30/17 2:01 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
[~julianhyde] in [email
thread|https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/de9b3eb0d9e2b2ef191a2c4a7fe395d2ff5d01131c9f5a500aa8f26a@%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E]
you have mentioned:
{quote}
ProjectRemoveRule currently takes one argument (the trivial project) but to see
the real type of that project's input the rule would need to take two arguments.
{quote}
I was going to prepare the fix for this issue but I did not quite get this
comment. Actually, I was going to modify RexUtil.isIdentity method to take
three arguments and compare field names as well as field types (as it was
before Vladimir changes). If I am not correct, could you please explain your
comment? Thank you in advance!
was (Author: arina):
[~julianhyde] in email thread you have mentioned:
{noformat}
ProjectRemoveRule currently takes one argument (the trivial project) but to see
the real type of that project's input the rule would need to take two arguments.
{noformat}
I was going to prepare the fix for this issue but I did not quite get this
comment. Actually, I was going to modify RexUtil.isIdentity method to take
three arguments and compare field names as well as field types (as it was
before Vladimir changes). If I am not correct, could you please explain your
comment? Thank you in advance!
> ProjectRemoveRule loses field names
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-1584
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1584
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jess Balint
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Minor
>
> the rule doesn't properly identify a child {{Project}} node
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
