[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16140498#comment-16140498
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-1966:
--------------------------------------

I reviewed 
https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/527/commits/dbc70ef36e7364509f2ee6586515c266cbf4077a,
 and it looks good, except that we need a test.

[~maryannxue] can you also review? I want to make sure that dropping 
RelOptTable doesn't remove options later on: I don't remember whether a 
RelOptTable can always be re-created from its fully-qualified name. 

> Support for normal views to act as materialization table
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1966
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1966
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Christian Beikov
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>
> Currently, it seems a materialized view can only have it's materialization in 
> a real table, although it might be nice to be able to use a view instead. 
> Since external data stores like e.g. elasticsearch aren't might have 
> different data representations, the mismatch has to be overcome by doing 
> casts in a view.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to