[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16461267#comment-16461267
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-2296:
--------------------------------------
Can you make this issue more concrete by giving an example query and what it
would simplify to?
Thanks for the reference to the code. I hate TODOs in code. So, now you've
logged the bug, if you're in that code for another reason, remove the TODO.
> Extra logic to derive additional filters from for FilterJoinRule
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2296
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2296
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.16.0
> Reporter: Vitalii Diravka
> Assignee: Vitalii Diravka
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: next
>
>
> There is necessary to add logic to derive additional filters from for
> FilterJoinRule in the case of using disjunction of expressions:
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/FilterJoinRule.java#L155
> Also it can solve CALCITE-2241.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
