[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1884?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16494292#comment-16494292
 ] 

Sergey Nuyanzin commented on CALCITE-1884:
------------------------------------------

[~julianhyde] thank you for your comment
just created a PR

however one [travis job failed 
|https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite-avatica/builds/385394506] (others are ok) 
with timeout issue {noformat}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.0:javadoc (default-cli) on 
project avatica-parent: Execution default-cli of goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.0:javadoc failed: Plugin 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:3.0.0 or one of its dependencies 
could not be resolved: Could not transfer artifact 
org.apache.maven.shared:maven-artifact-transfer:jar:0.9.1 from/to central 
(https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2): Connect to repo.maven.apache.org:443 
[repo.maven.apache.org/151.101.44.215] failed: Connection timed out (Connection 
timed out) -> [Help 1]
{noformat}


I do not think it somehow relates to the changes

> DateTimeUtils produces incorrect results for days before Gregorian cutovers
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-1884
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1884
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: avatica
>    Affects Versions: 1.13.0
>            Reporter: Haohui Mai
>            Assignee: Haohui Mai
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: avatica-1.12.0
>
>
> dateStringToUnixDate() / unixDateToString() do not return consistent result.
> The following test fails:
> {noformat}
>   @Test public void testUnixDate() {
>     int days = DateTimeUtils.dateStringToUnixDate("1500-04-30");
>     assertEquals("1500-04-30", DateTimeUtils.unixDateToString(days));
>   }
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to