[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2464?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16579716#comment-16579716
]
Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-2464:
----------------------------------------------
If the example you provided is valid then it confirms that there is an issue
with RelRecordType. Currently, the RelRecordType nullability does not dependent
on its fields but it is always not nullable.
In any case, I will have a look at the standard to see exactly what happens and
I will come back to it.
> Struct types are always not nullable
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2464
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2464
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.17.0
> Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> Struct types are always not nullable. This can lead to bugs in many parts of
> Calcite (e.g., expression simplification, optimization, code generation) that
> are considering the nullability of a RelDataType.
> The method
> [isNullable|https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/3c6b5ec759caadabb67f09d7a4963cc7d9386d0c/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/type/RelRecordType.java#L55]
> in the RelRecordType, which is used to represent a structured type, always
> returns false. The nullability of the RelRecordType should be a parameter in
> the constructor as it is the case for various other RelDataTypes.
> Additionally, the data type cache should also take into account the
> nullability of the type in order to return a correct equivalent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
