[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16598134#comment-16598134
 ] 

pengzhiwei commented on CALCITE-2469:
-------------------------------------

Hi [~julianhyde],I find same problem in the "improvement for strong functions".
{code:java}
546 +     if (simplified == null) {
547 +         operands.add(
548+         rexBuilder.makeCall(SqlStdOperatorTable.IS_NULL, operand));
549+      } else if (simplified.isAlwaysFalse()) {
550+          return rexBuilder.makeLiteral(false);
551+      } else {
{code}
In line 549,I think we should use "simplified.isAlwaysTrue()" here as any of 
the operand is null then this RexNode is null.And the return should be "true".

 
{code:java}
555 +      return RexUtil.composeConjunction(rexBuilder, operands, false);
556 +      case AS_IS:
{code}
In line 555,Also should we use RexUtil.composeDisjunction() here? For example, 
"(a+b) is null" equals "a is null or b is null",but not "a is null and b is 
null".

> RexSimplify should optimize '(NOT x) IS NULL' to 'x IS NULL'
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2469
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.17.0
>            Reporter: pengzhiwei
>            Assignee: Julian Hyde
>            Priority: Critical
>
> The RexSimplify currently optimizes '(not x) is null' to 'x is not null'. 
> However, this is incorrect. It is same to the case '(not x) is not null'. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to