[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16736246#comment-16736246
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-2648:
--------------------------------------
No, it should have just one. We're still in the LOGICAL level. We should not
have to make such decisions are this point.
> Output collation of EnumerableWindow is not consistent with its implementation
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2648
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2648
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.17.0
> Reporter: Hongze Zhang
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
>
> Here is a case:
> {code:sql}
> select x, COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY x) from (values (20), (35)) as t(x)
> ORDER BY x
> {code}
> Final plan:
> {code:java}
> EnumerableWindow(window#0=[window(partition {0} order by [] range between
> UNBOUNDED PRECEDING and UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING aggs [COUNT()])])
> EnumerableValues(tuples=[[{ 20 }, { 35 }]])
> {code}
> Output rows:
> {code:java}
> X |EXPR$1 |
> ---|-------|
> 35 |1 |
> 20 |1 |
> {code}
> EnumerableWindow is supposed to preserve input collations, as a result
> EnumerableSort is ignored. However the implementation of EnumerableWindow
> generates non-ordered output (when PARTITION BY clause is used).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
