[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16763767#comment-16763767
]
James Duong commented on CALCITE-2339:
--------------------------------------
The build for this PR now fails after merging from master in TravisCI.
It fails on the Calcite Plus module, which wasn't changed as part of this work
[https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/builds/490219956?utm_source=github_status&utm_medium=notification]
Master itself is failing Travis CI currently:
https://travis-ci.org/apache/calcite/jobs/489675325
> JDBC adapter should transform timestamp arithmetic for target database
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2339
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2339
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: jdbc-adapter
> Reporter: Julian Hyde
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: Datetime Addition - Calcite.pdf
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> JDBC adapter should transform timestamp arithmetic for target database.
> There are two ways in Calcite to add intervals to timestamps: the
> TIMESTAMP_ADD function and the "<timestamp> + <interval>" operator.
> The attached document (authored by James Doung) describes their pros and cons.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
