[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2899?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Mior resolved CALCITE-2899.
-----------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Deprecate RelTraitPropagationVisitor and remove its usages
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2899
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2899
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.18.0
>            Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Assignee: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.19.0
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> RelTraitPropagationVisitor is currently used only for debugging purposes 
> doing nothing more than throwing an assertion error if certain conditions 
> does not hold. By a quick search in the Jira, I couldn't find any issues 
> showing that the visitor really detected some problem. 
> According to the thread ["RelTraitPropagationVisitor and useless code 
> policy"|http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/calcite-dev/201810.mbox/%3CCAFQnWdaJFvKshBVnV0fLyTVksoFHWsGagVhMfQG06MjhPM==f...@mail.gmail.com%3E]
>  in the dev list the class is more or less useless and unlikely to be used in 
> the future.
> Moreover, the visitor traverses complete RelNode subtrees introduced after 
> rule matches (and their traits) affecting also the performance of the planner.
> Finally, the contract and the behavior of the class are not consistent.
> For the above reasons, I propose to deprecate the class and remove its usages.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to