[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16808411#comment-16808411
]
Julian Feinauer commented on CALCITE-2966:
------------------------------------------
Hi [~danny0405]... this is the last commit for the branch where multiple people
have been working on for a long time now (over 1 year).
So its not the commit itself, that is interesting but the state after the
commit with all the ~200 commits in the branch.
If it would help you, I can do a several branch where I squash all of them
together, but in this branch I want to keep the commits as the work was done by
several people and I think it would not be right to "mask" that by a single
squash commit from myself.
So either you checkout the commit in this branch or I prepare another squashed
branch for you, what you like better?
> Problem with Code Generation
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2966
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2966
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.20.0
> Reporter: Danny Chan
> Assignee: Danny Chan
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 1.20.0
>
>
> From the mailing list:
> Hi all,
> I have some problems with the code generation from Linq4j which I'm unable to
> resolve myself.
> Basically, I want to translate a condition from Rex to a Linq4j expression to
> use it in generated code.
> In my example the Condition is from Match Recognize and in SQL is:
> `up."commission" > prev(up."commission")`.
>
> ```
> RexBuilder rexBuilder = new RexBuilder(implementor.getTypeFactory());
> RexProgramBuilder rexProgramBuilder = new
> RexProgramBuilder(physType.getRowType(), rexBuilder);
>
> rexProgramBuilder.addCondition(entry.getValue());
>
> final Expression condition =
> RexToLixTranslator.translateCondition(rexProgramBuilder.getProgram(),
> (JavaTypeFactory) getCluster().getTypeFactory(),
> builder2,
> inputGetter1,
> implementor.allCorrelateVariables,
> implementor.getConformance());
>
> builder2.add(Expressions.return_(null, condition));
> ```
>
> Here, the condition seems okay, it is: ">(PREV(UP.$4, 0), PREV(UP.$4, 1))",
> so it should be a comparison of two variables (I rewrite the PREV with a
> custom Input Getter".
> But, the generated code (for Janino) is:
>
> ```
> Object p1 = row_.get($L4J$C$0_1);
> org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee p0 =
> (org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee) p1;
> Object p3 = row_.get($L4J$C$1_1);
> org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee p2 =
> (org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee) p3;
> Object p5 = row_.get($L4J$C$0_1);
> org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee p4 =
> (org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee) p5;
> Object p7 = row_.get($L4J$C$1_1);
> org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee p6 =
> (org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest.Employee) p7;
> return p0.commission && p2.commission && p4.commission > p6.commission;
> ```
>
> This confuses me a lot as I do not know where the check for p0.commission and
> p2.commission comes from.
> It seems that Linq4j adds them as it expects these variables to be nullable,
> but I have no idea on how to avoid this.
> These fields are Numeric so I always get a compilation exception.
>
> Can someone help me with this issue?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
