[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16818608#comment-16818608
 ] 

Danny Chan commented on CALCITE-3004:
-------------------------------------

[~zhztheplayer] i will take this issue if you agree.

> ProjectSetOpTransposeRule pushes RexOver down incorrectly
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3004
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3004
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.19.0
>            Reporter: Hongze Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Test case:
> {code:sql}
> select count(sal) over () from (select * from emp e1 union all select * from 
> emp e2)
> {code}
> Plan:
> {code}
> LogicalUnion(all=[true])
>   LogicalProject(EXPR$0=[COUNT($5) OVER (RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING 
> AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)])
>     LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], 
> SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
>   LogicalProject(EXPR$0=[COUNT($5) OVER (RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING 
> AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)])
>     LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], 
> SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
> {code}
> Should be:
> {code}
> LogicalProject(EXPR$0=[COUNT($5) OVER (RANGE BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND 
> UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING)])
>   LogicalUnion(all=[true])
>     LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], 
> SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
>     LogicalProject(EMPNO=[$0], ENAME=[$1], JOB=[$2], MGR=[$3], HIREDATE=[$4], 
> SAL=[$5], COMM=[$6], DEPTNO=[$7], SLACKER=[$8])
>       LogicalTableScan(table=[[CATALOG, SALES, EMP]])
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to