[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16839965#comment-16839965
]
Lai Zhou edited comment on CALCITE-2973 at 5/15/19 3:35 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------
[~rubenql], now the inner join with a remainCondtion won't be converted to an
inner-join plus a filter , the Enumerable(Hash)Join can handle it in a generic
way.
But some of tests are failed, may introduce a bug after dropping the filter.
I'll check the problems .
was (Author: hhlai1990):
[~rubenql], now the inner join with a remainCondtion won't be converted to an
inner-join plus a filter , the Enumerable(Hash)Join can handle it in a generic
way.
> Allow theta joins that have equi conditions to be executed using a hash join
> algorithm
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2973
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2973
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.19.0
> Reporter: Lai Zhou
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.20.0
>
> Time Spent: 3h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Now the EnumerableMergeJoinRule only supports an inner and equi join.
> If users make a theta-join query for a large dataset (such as 10000*10000),
> the nested-loop join process will take dozens of time than the sort-merge
> join process .
> So if we can apply merge-join or hash-join rule for a theta join, it will
> improve the performance greatly.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
