[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16841454#comment-16841454
]
Hongze Zhang edited comment on CALCITE-3075 at 5/16/19 3:33 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
One possible disadvantage of AppVeyor might be the performance - Now Calcite's
AppVevor CI need ~18 min (seems 15 min for most cases, 20+ min for bad ones) to
finish a build, as a comparison Travis CI costs ~13 min. Not sure if for
Windows build Travis can still be faster. It would be much appreciated if
anyone has experience on Travis+Windows and be willing to share some.
was (Author: zhztheplayer):
One possible disadvantage of AppVeyor might be the performance - Now Calcite's
AppVevor CI need ~18 min to finish a build, as a comparison Travis CI costs ~13
min. Not sure if for Windows build Travis can still be faster. It would be much
appreciated if anyone has experience on Travis+Windows and be willing to share
some.
> Evaluate Travis CI for Windows build
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3075
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3075
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hongze Zhang
> Priority: Major
>
> Travis.org supports running CI on Windows now:
> https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-10-11-windows-early-release, it is probably
> worth to investigate if running Windows CI using Travis would benefit us more
> than AppVevor can do.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
