[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3085?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16846349#comment-16846349
 ] 

Danny Chan commented on CALCITE-3085:
-------------------------------------

I don't think it's a good idea to remove the stack, this stack provides ability 
for child nodes to have access to parent nodes, although this is not that 
common but removing this will cause a regression. We can not make sure other 
engines with Calcite do not use this stack.

> Unused stack field in RelShuttleImpl
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3085
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3085
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Laurent Goujon
>            Assignee: Laurent Goujon
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {{RelShuttleImpl}} class has a  protected {{stack}} field which is being 
> populated when going over children, but those content is actually never used. 
> In Calcite code base, no subclasses are actually using the content of the 
> stack ({{CorelMapBuilder}} is populating the stack but does not read the 
> content back either).
> Searching code on github didn't show any usage of it either (but this is not 
> foolprof).
> As maintaining this stack has a non-negligible impact on memory/performance, 
> I would suggest to remove the field.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to