[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Haisheng Yuan updated CALCITE-3124:
-----------------------------------
    Description: 
Make the following changes (uncomment return clause) to /AggregateRemoveRule, 
the test case {{JdbcTest.testHavingNot2}} won't complete due to infinite rule 
matching.
{code: java}
--- a/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ public void onMatch(RelOptRuleCall call) {
         if (aggregation.getKind() == SqlKind.SUM0) {
         // Bail out for SUM0 to avoid potential infinite rule matching,
         // because it may be generated by transforming SUM aggregate
         // function to SUM0 and COUNT.
-        return;
+//        return;
       }
       final SqlSplittableAggFunction splitter =
           Objects.requireNonNull(
{code}


  was:
Make the following changes (uncomment return clause) to /AggregateRemoveRule, 
the test case {{JdbcTest.testHavingNot2}} won't complete due to infinite rule 
matching.
{code:diff}
--- a/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
+++ b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ public void onMatch(RelOptRuleCall call) {
         if (aggregation.getKind() == SqlKind.SUM0) {
         // Bail out for SUM0 to avoid potential infinite rule matching,
         // because it may be generated by transforming SUM aggregate
         // function to SUM0 and COUNT.
-        return;
+//        return;
       }
       final SqlSplittableAggFunction splitter =
           Objects.requireNonNull(
{code}



> Infinite rule matching when AggregateRemoveRule is enabled for SUM0
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3124
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3124
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
>            Priority: Major
>
> Make the following changes (uncomment return clause) to /AggregateRemoveRule, 
> the test case {{JdbcTest.testHavingNot2}} won't complete due to infinite rule 
> matching.
> {code: java}
> --- a/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
> +++ b/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rel/rules/AggregateRemoveRule.java
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ public void onMatch(RelOptRuleCall call) {
>          if (aggregation.getKind() == SqlKind.SUM0) {
>          // Bail out for SUM0 to avoid potential infinite rule matching,
>          // because it may be generated by transforming SUM aggregate
>          // function to SUM0 and COUNT.
> -        return;
> +//        return;
>        }
>        final SqlSplittableAggFunction splitter =
>            Objects.requireNonNull(
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to