[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3181?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16881530#comment-16881530
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3181:
--------------------------------------

Now switching to consider algebra rather than SQL syntax. It would make sense 
to have an implementation of {{Window}} (let's call it {{StreamingWindow}}) 
that exploits the fact that the input is sorted. If the Window only needed the 
top 3 rows in each partition, and if {{Sort}} supported partitioned top-n, then 
we could create a {{StreamingWindow}} on top of a top-n {{Sort}}, and the 
window would not even have to worry that the {{Sort}} is removing rows.

> Support limit per group in Window
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3181
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3181
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
>            Priority: Major
>
> We have a lot of queries like the following to retrieve top N tuples per 
> group:
> {code:java}
> SELECT x, y FROM
>      (SELECT x, y, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY x ORDER BY y) 
>      AS rn FROM t1) t2 WHERE rn <= 3;
> {code}
> The performance is not good if each group has a lot more tuples than wanted, 
> because we will retrieve and sort all the tuples, instead of just doing a 
> top-N heap sort.
> In order to do optimization for this kind of query, we need to extend window 
> to support limit, if and only if there is only 1 window function, and it is 
> {{row_number()}}. We also need a substitute rule to push the limit into 
> window. Of course, we also need to modify executor to support this 
> optimization (can be later).
> {code:java}
> Filter (rn <= 3)
>   +- Window (window#0={Partition by x order by y ROW_NUMBER()})
> {code}
> to
> {code:java}
> Filter (rn <= 3)
>   +- Window (window#0={Partition by x order by y limit 3 ROW_NUMBER()})
> {code}
> Thoughts? Objections?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to