[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16885816#comment-16885816
 ] 

jin xing commented on CALCITE-3197:
-----------------------------------

[~julianhyde]
THX a lot for comment. 
“The idea that a representation knows what it really should be seems very 
wrong”  -- This really helps me to get clear about the design.

I will refine my change by your comment.

> Convert data of Timestamp/Time/Date as original form when enumerating from 
> ArrayTable
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3197
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3197
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: jin xing
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In current implementation ColumnLoader, data of 
> {{Rep.JAVA_SQL_TIMESTAMP/Rep.JAVA_SQL_TIME/Rep.JAVA_SQL_DATE}} are converted 
> as numeric during loading. 
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/adapter/clone/ColumnLoader.java#L234
> But current code seems forgot to revert the data back to original form when 
> enumerating.
> As a result, below test is failing now
> {code:java}
> // MaterializationTest.java
> @Test public void testTimestampType() {
>   String sql = "select \"eventid\", \"ts\"\n"
>         + "from \"events\"\n"
>         + "where \"eventid\" > 5";
>   checkMaterialize(sql, sql);
> }{code}
> For type of {{Rep.JAVA_SQL_TIMESTAMP/Rep.JAVA_SQL_TIME/Rep.JAVA_SQL_DATE}}, 
> cursor acesses by {{TimestampAccessor/TimeAccessor/DateAccessor}}, which 
> expect column value as {{Timestamp/Time/Date}}.
> It make sense to 'unwrap' the data as original form when enumerating from 
> {{ArrayTable}}.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.14#76016)

Reply via email to