[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3414?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16952480#comment-16952480
]
Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3414:
-------------------------------------
Thanks Julian for clarifying the strategy, then i think keep
Types.castIfNecessary in linq4j is the right way to choose, but we should give
more doc to it and states that in which case it can be used.
Instead of copy code from Types.castIfNecessary into
RexToLixTranslator.convert, why not reuse and invoke Types.castIfNecessary
directly from inside RexToLixTranslator.convert ?
> Unify Expression'type cast and conversion as a robust one
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3414
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3414
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Affects Versions: 1.21.0
> Reporter: Feng Zhu
> Assignee: Feng Zhu
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Attachments: RexToLixTranslator.png, TypeConversion.txt, Types.png
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Current now, there are two functions in calcite that can be used to
> cast/convert Expression to a specific Type.
> *_Types.castIfNecessary_* and _*RexToLixTranslator.convert*_.
> We make a deep investigation on their implementations and demonstrate them as
> below.
> {color:#ff0000}
> !RexToLixTranslator.png!{color}
> {color:#ff0000}
> *RexToLixTranslator.convert*{color}
> !Types.png!
> {color:#ff0000}
> *Types.castIfNecessary*{color}
> It can be seen that:
> (1) They have a lot of overlaps;
> (2) *_RexToLixTranslator.cast_* can cover more cases with tools like
> _SqlFunctions_ and etc.
> (3) Both of them have limitations and may generate incorrect code, which is
> listed in attachment(TypeConversion.txt).
> Multiple choices usually bring confusion to developers and resulting to the
> misuse of them.
> For example, CALCITE-3245 exposes that Types.castIfNecessary cannot cast the
> Expression to BigDecimal.class.
> Fixing the issue in *_Types.castIfNecessary_* directly seems to be not a
> good idea.
> On one hand, it is not convenient to call _SqlFunctions_ in linq4j. One the
> other hand, it will brings duplicate with _*RexToLixTranslator.cast*_.
> However, due to some unique logic in _*Types.castIfNecessary*_, we cannot
> replace it as _*RexToLixTranslator.cast*_ neither.
> Therefore, it is a good idea to integrate implementations into
> RexToLixTranslator.cast.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
