[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jin Xing updated CALCITE-3505:
------------------------------
Description:
Run ScannableTableTest#testProjectableFilterableTableJoin with minor change to
reproduce
{code:java}
@Test public void testProjectableFilterableTableJoin() throws Exception {
final StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder();
final String explain = "PLAN="
+ "EnumerableHashJoin(condition=[=($0, $3)], joinType=[inner])\n"
+ " EnumerableInterpreter\n"
+ " BindableTableScan(table=[[s, b1]], filters=[[=($0, 10)]])\n"
+ " EnumerableInterpreter\n"
+ " BindableTableScan(table=[[s, b2]], filters=[[=($0, 10)]])";
CalciteAssert.that()
.with(
newSchema("s",
Pair.of("b1", new BeatlesProjectableFilterableTable(buf, true)),
Pair.of("b2", new BeatlesProjectableFilterableTable(buf,
true))))
.query("select * from \"s\".\"b1\", \"s\".\"b2\" "
+ "where \"s\".\"b1\".\"i\" = 10 and \"s\".\"b2\".\"i\" = 10 "
+ "and \"s\".\"b1\".\"i\" = \"s\".\"b2\".\"i\"")
.withHook(Hook.PLANNER, (Consumer<RelOptPlanner>) planner -> {
planner.removeRule(EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_MERGE_JOIN_RULE);
})
.explainContains(explain);
}
{code}
This test has nothing to do with ENUMERABLE_MERGE_JOIN_RULE, but if we disable
it with planner hook, stackoverflow happens;
I debugged and found that FilterProjectTransposeRule is matched infinitely and
I found input-cycle of two RelSubset of EnumerableConvention from graphviz.
> Infinite matching of FilterProjectTransposeRule causes stackoverflow
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3505
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3505
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jin Xing
> Priority: Major
>
> Run ScannableTableTest#testProjectableFilterableTableJoin with minor change
> to reproduce
> {code:java}
> @Test public void testProjectableFilterableTableJoin() throws Exception {
> final StringBuilder buf = new StringBuilder();
> final String explain = "PLAN="
> + "EnumerableHashJoin(condition=[=($0, $3)], joinType=[inner])\n"
> + " EnumerableInterpreter\n"
> + " BindableTableScan(table=[[s, b1]], filters=[[=($0, 10)]])\n"
> + " EnumerableInterpreter\n"
> + " BindableTableScan(table=[[s, b2]], filters=[[=($0, 10)]])";
> CalciteAssert.that()
> .with(
> newSchema("s",
> Pair.of("b1", new BeatlesProjectableFilterableTable(buf,
> true)),
> Pair.of("b2", new BeatlesProjectableFilterableTable(buf,
> true))))
> .query("select * from \"s\".\"b1\", \"s\".\"b2\" "
> + "where \"s\".\"b1\".\"i\" = 10 and \"s\".\"b2\".\"i\" =
> 10 "
> + "and \"s\".\"b1\".\"i\" = \"s\".\"b2\".\"i\"")
> .withHook(Hook.PLANNER, (Consumer<RelOptPlanner>) planner -> {
> planner.removeRule(EnumerableRules.ENUMERABLE_MERGE_JOIN_RULE);
> })
> .explainContains(explain);
> }
> {code}
> This test has nothing to do with ENUMERABLE_MERGE_JOIN_RULE, but if we
> disable it with planner hook, stackoverflow happens;
> I debugged and found that FilterProjectTransposeRule is matched infinitely
> and I found input-cycle of two RelSubset of EnumerableConvention from
> graphviz.
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
