[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17020879#comment-17020879
]
Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-3753:
----------------------------------------------
Hi [~hyuan], just to be sure I understand. Are you proposing to drop importance
from the subsets and replace the rule queue with an unordered data structure?
> Always try to match and execute substitution rule first and remove rulematch
> ordering
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3753
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3753
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
> Priority: Major
>
> In VolcanoPlanner, some rules e.g. ProjectMergeRule, PruneEmptyRule can be
> defined as SubstitutionRule, so that we can always try to match and execute
> them first (without deferring rule call). All the other rulematches doesn't
> need to be sorted and rules can be executed in any order they matched, since
> we are going to execute all of them anyway, sooner or later. Computing and
> comparing importances cause a lot of latency.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
