[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17030304#comment-17030304
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-3769:
--------------------------------------

An alternative is to deprecate {{toRel}}.

(I really don’t know which I prefer. But let’s consider both.)

{{ToRelContext}} is difficult to understand, and poorly named. Before we add it 
to the {{RelBuilder}} API it needs to be better designed. 

> Deprecate TableScanRule
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3769
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3769
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.21.0
>            Reporter: Danny Chen
>            Assignee: Danny Chen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.22.0
>
>
> The TableScanRule is the only planner rule that for a logical node(e.g. the 
> table scan), it’s functionality is to pass along the cluster object and 
> invoke the RelOptTable#toRel. It’s function is very trivial because it 
> supplies only a ToRelContext that does not support expanding view/passing 
> table hints.
> For rels that come from the sql-to-rel conversion, there is already a table 
> conversion logic[1]. This code gives a powerful
> ToRelContext that has the complete functionality.
> The only reason that I saw the meaning of existing TableScanRule is for the 
> TableScan that comes from the RelBuilder#scan.
> So I would suggest to deprecate the TableScanRule, instead, we support 
> translating the table directly in RelBuilder#scan,
> We also add a new interface RelBuilder#scan(Iterable<String> tableNames, 
> ToRelContext context), so that we can pass in a more powerful ToRelContext 
> explicitly.
> [1] 
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/d6fa25cd11625ad7b4b74dafbd0211c701b38d49/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/sql2rel/SqlToRelConverter.java#L3498



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to