[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17039321#comment-17039321
]
Rui Wang commented on CALCITE-3796:
-----------------------------------
Thanks Julian and Stamatis.
[~zabetak] I will try to figure out if there are some other semantics about
array comparison.
It sounds ok for me either supporting it as an enumerable implementation
because parser/validator does make it pass already, or Calcite could
invalidates the query if it contains comparison in this Jira (sounds like maybe
need some config to disallow such comparison).
> Support Array operator <, <=, >, >=
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-3796
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3796
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Rui Wang
> Assignee: Rui Wang
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Seems like Calcite has an =, <> support for array type. But it does not have
> <, <=, >, >= support.
> Postgresql array operators:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/functions-array.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
