[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3852?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17056969#comment-17056969
 ] 

Zoltan Haindrich commented on CALCITE-3852:
-------------------------------------------

I always wanted to address this; but forgot :)

[~Chunwei Lei], yes in case we only handle non-nullable variables; I think we 
should - and we probably could:
it might be interesting to watch out for null-s during the following case:
{code}
AND(x=9, OR(x!=9, c) )
{code}

I think an option could be to rewrite {{x!=9}} into something which is false in 
case x is not null; but null otherwise; something like:
{code}
AND(null,x is null)
{code}

> RexSimplify doesn't simplify NOT EQUAL predicates
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3852
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3852
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Chunwei Lei
>            Assignee: Chunwei Lei
>            Priority: Major
>
> Given x=9, RexSimplify does not simplify x != 9 to false.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to