[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3927?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17088895#comment-17088895
 ] 

Botong Huang edited comment on CALCITE-3927 at 4/21/20, 5:35 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

The unit test gives an example of what can happen in real case, where 
PhysSingleSubsetRule is a physical rule that has an operand matching for 
RelSubset. When two RelSets having none identical physical traits get merged 
(e.g. PHYS_CALLING_CONVENTION3 that is in the new RelSet but not in the 
original RelSet), the RelSubset with the new physical trait that gets merged in 
will never trigger the rule match again, but it should. 

In reality, the two physical trait PHYS_CALLING_CONVENTION and 
PHYS_CALLING_CONVENTION3 with the satisfy relationship can be something like 
"any" and "hash[0]"


was (Author: botong):
The unit test gives an example of what can happen in real case, where 
PhysSingleSubsetRule is a physical rule that has an operand matching for 
RelSubset. When two RelSets having none identical physical traits get merged 
(e.g. PHYS_CALLING_CONVENTION3 that is in the new RelSet but not in the 
original RelSet), the RelSubset with the new physical trait that gets merged in 
will never trigger the rule match again, but it should. 

> RelSubset is not fired for rule when set gets merged
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3927
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3927
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Haisheng Yuan
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In VolcanoPlanner, when set gets merged, planner fires rules again for 
> RelNodes in both sets, but not for RelSubset. We might miss something because 
> of this. 
> If all the logical transformation rules and physical implementation rules are 
> separated out in different stage and physical rules don't do logical work, we 
> might be OK. But the reality is that all the things are mixed together at the 
> moment.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to