[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17141682#comment-17141682
 ] 

Danny Chen commented on CALCITE-3786:
-------------------------------------

I don't think that reduce the redundant object references can significantly 
reduce memory consumption. In order to remove the object references, you have 
to:

- Make the Digest an inner class
- Add #getRelDigest #digestEquals #digestHash (plus the original #getDigest 
#explainTerms)

I don't think these interfaces are necessary and have clear semantics, in order 
to reduce memory usage which is not a bottleneck.

Expose a single interface #explainTerms with different SqlExplainLevel is well 
to use and compatible with the old behaviors.

Maybe we really have disagreement on the design, i have to say i will not 
accept it.

If possible, move to the RexNode memo, which can indeed reduce memory 
consumption significantly, and i would give a definite +1 for that.

> Add Digest interface to enable efficient hashCode(equals) for RexNode and 
> RelNode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3786
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3786
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: core
>    Affects Versions: 1.21.0
>            Reporter: Vladimir Sitnikov
>            Assignee: Danny Chen
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.24.0
>
>          Time Spent: 8h 40m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Current digests for RexNode, RelNode, RelType, and similar cases use String 
> concatenation.
> It is easy to implement, however, it has drawbacks:
> 1) String objects cannot be reused. For instance, RexCall has operands, 
> however, the digest is duplicated. It causes extra memory use and extra CPU 
> for string copying
> 2) There's no way to have multiple #toString() methods. RelType might need 
> multiple digests: "including field names", "excluding field names".
> A suggested resolution might be behind the lines of
> {code:java}
> class Digest { // immutable
>   final int hashCode; // speedup hashCode and equals
>   final Object[] contents; // The values are either other Digest objects or 
> Strings
>   String toString(); // e.g. for debugging purposes
>   int compareTo(Digest); // e.g. for debugging purposes.
> }
> {code}
> Note how fields in Kotlin are aligned much better, and it makes it easier to 
> read:
> {code:java}
> class Digest { // immutable
>   val hashCode: Int // speedup hashCode and equals
>   val contents: Array<Any> // The values are either other Digest objects or 
> Strings
>   fun toString(): String // e.g. for debugging purposes
>   fun compareTo(other: Digest): Int // e.g. for debugging purposes.
> }
> {code}
> Then the digest for RexCall could be the bits relevant to RexCall itself + 
> digests of the operands (which can be reused as is)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to