[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17181305#comment-17181305
 ] 

Qi Zhou commented on CALCITE-3913:
----------------------------------

Hi Michael, Thanks for helping me. I am planning to push more code next week. I 
was trying to separate it into multiple commits, so it is easier to do the code 
review. I thought I have to submit a PR to trigger the review process. (Please 
correct me if I am wrong on this.) 

> Test correctness using formal verification techniques
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3913
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3913
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Qi Zhou
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We have developed a technique that can formally be verified if two logical 
> plans in calcite are indeed semantically equivalent. We published this paper 
> in VLDB 2019. Here is the [link to the 
> paper|https://www.vldb.org/pvldb/vol12/p1276-zhou.pdf].
> This technique converts two logical plan into their symbolic representations 
> and using an SMT (Satisfiability modulo theories) solver to verify the 
> relationship between two symbolic representations to verify the equivalence. 
> We are wondering if it is possible that we can integrate this tool into 
> calcite, as a way to help the correctness testing process in calcite.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to