[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4287?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Liya Fan updated CALCITE-4287:
------------------------------
Description:
In some rules (e.g. {{AggregateJoinRemoveRule#onMatch)}}, the logic of checking
if the aggregate references any columns from the other side is incorrect.
For example, given an aggregate on a left join, the logic checks if the
aggregate references any columns from the right side. If the aggregate happens
to references the last column of the left input, the current implementation
will make a wrong decision to skip the rule match.
This will miss opportunities of simplifying the plan.
was:
In {{AggregateJoinRemoveRule#onMatch}}, the logic of checking if the aggregate
references any columns from the other side is incorrect.
For example, given an aggregate on a left join, the logic checks if the
aggregate references any columns from the right side. If the aggregate happens
to references the last column of the left input, the current implementation
will make a wrong decision to skip the rule match.
This will miss opportunities of simplifying the plan.
> Fix the bug in checking aggregate input references in some rules
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-4287
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4287
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Liya Fan
> Assignee: Liya Fan
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In some rules (e.g. {{AggregateJoinRemoveRule#onMatch)}}, the logic of
> checking if the aggregate references any columns from the other side is
> incorrect.
> For example, given an aggregate on a left join, the logic checks if the
> aggregate references any columns from the right side. If the aggregate
> happens to references the last column of the left input, the current
> implementation will make a wrong decision to skip the rule match.
> This will miss opportunities of simplifying the plan.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)