[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4467?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17264582#comment-17264582
 ] 

Jesus Camacho Rodriguez commented on CALCITE-4467:
--------------------------------------------------

Fwiw, from PG documentation:
{quote}
In order to allow numeric values to be sorted and used in tree-based indexes, 
PostgreSQL treats NaN values as equal, and greater than all non-NaN values.
{quote}

> Incorrect simplification for 'NaN' value
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4467
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4467
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>            Assignee: Jesus Camacho Rodriguez
>            Priority: Major
>
> {{RexSimplify}} simplifies {{x = x}} to {{null or x is not null}} (similarly 
> <= and >=), and {{x != x}} to {{null and x is null}} (similarly < and >).
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/blob/master/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/rex/RexSimplify.java#L363
> This may not be applicable in some cases. For instance, if the type of x is 
> floating-point, x could be 'NaN'. While some RDBMS consider 'NaN' = 'NaN' 
> (e.g., Postgres), some others consider 'NaN' != 'NaN' following the IEEE 754 
> standard. For the latest, the rewriting above will result in incorrect 
> results.
> I think we should simply ignore this simplification for floating-point type.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to