[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17351626#comment-17351626
 ] 

Jin Xing commented on CALCITE-3366:
-----------------------------------

I means it's good if some other people could take this jira and continue the 
work, since the issue is valid.

pr-2370 resolved conflicts of pr-1468. But pr-2370 has also been out dated for 
quite a while. It's great if @xzh_dz could continue the work.

> RelDecorrelator supports Union
> ------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-3366
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3366
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jin Xing
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 4h 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> This issue proposes to support decorrelation for below sql
> {code:java}
> SELECT deptno FROM dept where exists
> (SELECT 1 FROM emp where sal < 100 and emp.deptno=dept.deptno
> union all
> SELECT 1 FROM emp where sal > 200 and emp.deptno=dept.deptno){code}
> This issue was found when I resolve CALCITE-3363 in 
> https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1466 
> I failed to construct an semi-join operator from SQL string.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to