[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4702?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17387493#comment-17387493
 ] 

Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-4702:
----------------------------------------------

I guess we should introduce a new method in the {{SqlDialect}} interface and 
adapt the SQL generated from the {{RelToSqlConverter}} accordingly. 

> Error when executing query with GROUP BY constant via JDBC adapter
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4702
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4702
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core, jdbc-adapter
>    Affects Versions: 1.27.0
>            Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Assignee: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Priority: Major
>
> The following functionally equivalent SQL queries are accepted by Calcite and 
> produce a valid plan 
> {noformat}
> select avg(salary) from employee group by true
> select avg(salary) from employee group by 'a'
> {noformat}
> but they may fail if they are executed via the JDBC adapter since not all 
> DBMS allow grouping by constants expressions. Moreover, what works for one 
> may not work for the other. 
> +Examples+
> The {{GROUP BY TRUE}} query works in Postgres, and MySQL but fails in 
> Redshift with the following exception:
> {noformat}
> com.amazon.redshift.util.RedshiftException: ERROR: non-integer constant in 
> GROUP BY
> {noformat}
> The {{GROUP BY 'a'}} query works in MySQL but fails in Postgres with the 
> following exception:
> {noformat}
> ERROR:  non-integer constant in GROUP BY
> {noformat}
> The {{GROUP BY}} constant essentially means {{GROUP BY}} nothing and there is 
> a nice [blog 
> post|https://blog.jooq.org/2018/05/25/how-to-group-by-nothing-in-sql/] 
> listing some limitations of various DBMS. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to