[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17402309#comment-17402309
]
Yingyu commented on CALCITE-2736:
---------------------------------
[~vladimirsitnikov]Thanks for your help in review and your comment. I agree
with you that in general we should avoid negative naming. I've updated the
naming using `treatDynamicCallsAsConstants` as suggested.
Regarding the use case the direct usage would be to reduce query_user as part
of planning despite it being a dynamic function.
> ReduceExpressionsRule never reduces dynamic expressions but this should be
> configurable
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-2736
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2736
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core
> Reporter: Jacques Nadeau
> Assignee: Jacques Nadeau
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There are situations where it is helpful to reduce dynamic SqlCalls. Right
> now, the ReduceExpressionsRule always avoids doing this. We should enhance
> the rule so this can be configurable depending on where in planning the rule
> is used.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
