[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17412891#comment-17412891
 ] 

zhishui commented on CALCITE-4764:
----------------------------------

I look and test CALCITE-4736, I think there are different situations.

When we use below example.Attention, literal 10 in sql mv2 is integer while 
corresponding value  in CALCITE-4736  is string would cause problem above on. 
Except this, there have a lot  symptoms.
@Test void testQueryRewriteFlowFail() {    final String mv1 = ""
        + "select count(1) as cnt "        + "from \"emps\" "        + "where 
cast(\"commission\" as varchar) = '20' "        + "group by \"deptno\"";    
final String mv2 = ""
        + "select count(1) as cnt "        + "from \"emps\" "        + "where 
cast(\"commission\" as varchar) = 10 "        + "group by \"deptno\"";    final 
String query = ""
        + "select count(1) as cnt "        + "from \"emps\" "        + "where 
cast(\"commission\" as varchar) = '10' "        + "group by \"deptno\"";
    sql(ImmutableList.of(mv1, mv2), query).ok();
  }
 

 

> RexImplicationChecker throw ex, when meeting RexNode with `CAST` operator.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4764
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4764
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Xurenhe
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: image-2021-09-05-17-02-58-266.png, 
> image-2021-09-06-08-17-20-788.png
>
>
> I run an example in `RexImplicationChecker`, but it throw ex.
> {code:sql}
> col is a field of Java type "Integer"
> rexnode1: cast(col as char) > '10'
> rexnode2: cast(col as char) > '20'
> {code}
> I debug it, found some unclear code in 
> `org.apache.calcite.plan.RexImplicationChecker.InputUsageFinder#updateBinaryOpUsage`.
>  I found `InputUsageFinder` will discard `CAST`, as screenshot
> !image-2021-09-05-17-02-58-266.png!
> ----
> Should we enchane code here?
>  And, it may be root reason of 
> [CALCITE-4736|https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/CALCITE/issues/CALCITE-4736]
> ----
> Complete test:
> {code:java}
>   @Test void testSimple() {
>     final Fixture f = new Fixture();
>     final RexNode xGeB = f.ge(f.cast(f.charDataType, f.i), 
> f.charLiteral("20"));
>     final RexNode xGeA = f.ge(f.cast(f.charDataType, f.i), 
> f.charLiteral("10"));
>     f.checkImplies(xGeB, xGeA);
>   }
> {code}
> ----
> I will follow and improve it, If it's a deficiency.
>  Thanks a lot.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to