[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17448932#comment-17448932
 ] 

Jing Zhang commented on CALCITE-4888:
-------------------------------------

[~nobigo]Hello, maybe you misunderstand my meaning. You concern is a problem, 
of course, but it's a problem which we aim to solve in this ticket. The problem 
you referred belongs to implicit type conversion, it also exists in other cases.

{code:java}
select * from table1 where name = 'xb fadfad'
select * from table1 where name = 'xb'
select * from table1 where name < 'xb'
{code}

Besides, the pr would not change the behavior of Postgres, because 
`PostgresqlSqlDialect` does not enable 
`shouldConvertRaggedUnionTypesToVarying`. You could also check the 
`RexBuilderTest#testMakeInCharWithDiffLength`,   I've added the UT in the UT.

BTW, I've updated the JIRA description to describe what problem I want to 
solve. Maybe it could help you to understand.

> Unify type inferring logical for Sarg RexLiteral
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4888
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4888
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: core
>            Reporter: Jing Zhang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: image-2021-11-23-10-31-05-137.png
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There exists some inconsistency to infer type of Sarg RexLiteral.
> 1. The method `RexSargBuilder#getType` in `RexSimplify` using 
> `rexBuilder.typeFactory.leastRestrictive(Util.distinctList(types));`
> 2. The methods `RexBuilder#makeIn` and `RexBuilder#makeBetween` using type of 
> first ranges as Sarg RexLiteral's type.
> It's better to unify type inferring logical for Sarg RexLiteral.
> IMO, I think using 
> `rexBuilder.typeFactory.leastRestrictive(Util.distinctList(types));` is more 
> reasonable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to