[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4925?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17455923#comment-17455923
 ] 

Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4925:
--------------------------------------

This is a useful change, nicely implemented. Two minor changes:
 * Add a {{<p>}} paragraph markers the javadoc. Javadoc is not smart enough to 
recognize a blank line as a paragraph break.
 * Could  

> AggregateReduceFunctionsRule should accept arbitrary predicates
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-4925
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4925
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Will Noble
>            Assignee: Will Noble
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.29.0
>
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {{AggregateReduceFunctionsRule}} allows you to specify which functions to 
> reduce, but only allows you to specify by function type. For instance, you 
> can either reduce all {{SUM}} functions, or no {{SUM}} functions, but not a 
> subset of {{SUM}} functions (say, only the {{SUM}} functions with distinct 
> keys). Allowing the user to specify an arbitrary predicate would allow us to 
> selectively apply the rule to functions without distinct keys, which matters 
> in Looker due to the fact that distinct keys cause an aggregate to be 
> impossible to roll up, and when that's the case, we'd like to avoid reducing 
> the functions for the purpose of aggregate awareness.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to