[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17490697#comment-17490697
 ] 

Istvan Toth commented on CALCITE-5009:
--------------------------------------

Ultimately, createConnection()
{noformat}
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaClientRuntimeException: Remote driver 
error: 
  RuntimeException: Connection already exists: 
e1cbaa54-dd66-461e-8bee-15d6a6296581 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.Service$ErrorResponse.toException(Service.java:2475)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteProtobufService._apply(RemoteProtobufService.java:62)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.ProtobufService.apply(ProtobufService.java:81)
 at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta$3.call(RemoteMeta.java:114) at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta$3.call(RemoteMeta.java:110) at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.invokeWithRetries(AvaticaConnection.java:793)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta.openConnection(RemoteMeta.java:109)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.openConnection(AvaticaConnection.java:154)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.invokeWithRetries(AvaticaConnection.java:797)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta.connectionSync(RemoteMeta.java:134)
 at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta$1.call(RemoteMeta.java:88) at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta$1.call(RemoteMeta.java:85) at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.invokeWithRetries(AvaticaConnection.java:793)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.remote.RemoteMeta.createStatement(RemoteMeta.java:84)
 at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaStatement.<init>(AvaticaStatement.java:115) 
at 
  org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaStatement.<init>(AvaticaStatement.java:101) 
at
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaJdbc41Factory$AvaticaJdbc41Statement.<init>(AvaticaJdbc41Factory.java:118)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaJdbc41Factory$AvaticaJdbc41Statement.<init>(AvaticaJdbc41Factory.java:114)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaJdbc41Factory.newStatement(AvaticaJdbc41Factory.java:76)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.createStatement(AvaticaConnection.java:343)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.createStatement(AvaticaConnection.java:167)
 at 
  
org.apache.calcite.avatica.AvaticaConnection.createStatement(AvaticaConnection.java:63)
 at
  org.springframework.jdbc.core.JdbcTemplate.execute(JdbcTemplate.java:379) at 
<application part deleted> {noformat}
 

> Make sure transaparent jdbc connection re-creation does not lead to data loss
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-5009
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5009
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: avatica
>            Reporter: Istvan Toth
>            Priority: Major
>
> Currently, if the server-side JDBC connection goes away for any reason
>  * Avatica connection cache expiry
>  * LB/HA Failover
>  * Some problem with the "real" connection
> we attempt to create a new "real" JDBC connection, and continue using that 
> instead of the original connection
> [https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/fbdcc62745a0e8920db759fb6bdce564d854e407/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/AvaticaConnection.java#L796]
> This is fine for most read-only connections, but it can break transaction 
> semantics, which is captured in the "real" connection object.
> {noformat}
> conn.setAutocommit(false)
> stmt = conn.createStatement()
> execute(insert A)
> //Connection lost and object recreated which now proxies a new "real" 
> connection
> execute(insert B)
> conn.commit()
> //We have lost "insert A"{noformat}
> I'm not sure if we synchronize autocommit state of the new connection to the 
> lost one or not, but it's bad either way.
>  
> We should either completely drop this feature, add some logic that avoids it 
> if there is an open transaction and/or only allow it for connections that 
> have the readOnly flag set.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to