[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17633459#comment-17633459
]
Benchao Li commented on CALCITE-5379:
-------------------------------------
1 for this kind of changes, there is no need to have a Jira case, and
committing without a "+1" also sounds good to me.
For others cases, e.g. performance regression, which need more descriptions or
discussions, we should still create a Jira to track it.
> Upgrade protobuf version to 3.21.9 because of CVE
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5379
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5379
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: avatica
> Affects Versions: avatica-1.22.0
> Reporter: Sergey Nuyanzin
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There is a CVE in current version
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-3171
> fixed in 3.21.7
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
