[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17717857#comment-17717857
]
Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-5677:
--------------------------------------
Oh, I thought you wanted to generate SUBSTR. FWIW, Oracle seems to have
{{SUBSTR}} but not {{SUBSTRING}}. But sure, go ahead and remove the override.
It seems like a net gain.
I am still concerned that some databases have different semantics for
non-positive pos values. But the only solution there is to actually test
against each DB.
> SUBSTR signature incorrect for BigQuery
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5677
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5677
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Tanner Clary
> Assignee: Tanner Clary
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> BigQuery's {{SUBSTR(value, position[, length])}} function currently gets
> translated to the standard {{SUBSTRING(value FROM position[ FOR length])}}.
> BigQuery expects the arguments to be comma-separated rather than the use of
> the {{FROM}} and {{FOR}} keywords.
> EXAMPLE: {{SUBSTR('hello', 2)}} would get translated to {{SUBSTRING('hello'
> FROM 2)}} which BigQuery does not recognize.
> Hive addresses this issue by adding onto {{HiveSqlDialect#unparseCall}}
> method. I believe BigQuery should do something similar to avoid this
> incorrect translation. The docs for the {{SUBSTR}} (and alias {{SUBSTRING}})
> function may be found
> [here|https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/string_functions#substr].
> I will open a PR shortly that implements my suggestion and adds a couple of
> tests as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
